EVALUATING
A READING SOURCE/ PRESENTATION
Instructions: Read each criteria for evaluating a source and rate each category according to the correct statement
Category:
|
4
Superior
|
3
Well done
|
2
Adequate
|
1
Needs improvement
|
0
Unsatisfactory
|
|
CLEAR |
Explains
completely w/ clear examples illustrations, good delivery
|
|
Explains
partially completely w/ somewhat clear examples illustrations, average
delivery
|
|
Doesn’t
explain clearly or use clear examples, illustrations poor delivery average delivery |
| Captures main idea & Support points | Captures main idea of piece | Gives part of the main idea | Not clear about main idea | Main idea is only indirectly related to the article. | doesn't give main idea or gives wrong main idea |
|
Accurate, precise evidence |
Gives
excellent support with verifiable facts,
using very specific details related directly to the thesis stated
|
Gives
good support with some verifiable facts, referring to how facts
were checked |
Gives
enough supporting details with a some verifiable Facts,
loosely connected to thesis |
Gives
little/ minimal support with a few facts and hardly any connection to thesis |
Doesn’t
give support with no verifiable facts |
|
FAIR/ UNBIASED |
Several
ways of examining this issue is addressed, no personal bias |
|
O |
This
issue isn’t addressed for other outlooks, no personal bias |
This
issue isn’t addressed for other outlooks. Personal bias expressed
|